Date Posted

Former-Gambian Minister appeals Swiss conviction for crimes against humanity

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
The hearings are ​set to continue until at least April 17.
A former Gambian Minister appeared in a Swiss court ‌this Monday to appeal against a conviction for crimes against humanity under former-Dictator Yahya Jammeh.
Ousman Sonko’s conviction for homicide, torture and false imprisonment in May 2024 was historic since he was ​the highest-ranking former official ever to be tried in Europe using universal ​jurisdiction, which allows for the prosecution of the most serious crimes ⁠anywhere.
Five of the 10 Gambian plaintiffs in the case were present at the ​Higher Appeals Chamber of the Federal Criminal Court in the city of Bellinzona alongside ​the defendant, witnesses said.
Sonko, who acted as interior minister until the former strongman Jammeh dismissed him in 2016, is appealing the ruling for crimes allegedly committed between 2000-2016.
His Lawyer Philippe Currat ​argued in court on Monday that many of the alleged acts happened before ​the relevant Swiss legislation took effect in 2011. “The conditions for criminal prosecution are not met,” he ‌said ⁠in a statement.
Plaintiffs and the prosecution are also appealing the ruling with the aim of prolonging his 20-year sentence to life and expanding it to include sexual violence after Sonko was previously acquitted of rape.
“Sexual violence was a tool of repression ​in the Gambia and ​that should be ⁠taken into account and recognized by the Court as such,” said Benoit Meystre, a legal adviser at TRIAL International, which ​filed the original complaint against Sonko and is supporting plaintiffs.
Sonko ​has already ⁠been in custody over nine years, Currat said.
Reed Brody, a member of the International Commission of Jurists working with Jammeh’s victims, said the case could help efforts in ⁠the West ​African country to prosecute Jammeh-era crimes.
The hearings are ​set to continue until at least April 17. A final appeal is possible against the appeal verdict ​but would typically take place without public hearings.
–Reuters–